Harte ker[^24^]https: www.gabler banklexikon.de definition kapitalerhaltungspuffer 70472

What Is Kapitalerhaltungspuffer?

The Kapitalerhaltungspuffer, or Capital Conservation Buffer (CCoB), is a crucial component of international bankenregulierung designed to ensure banks maintain adequate Eigenkapital to absorb losses during periods of financial stress. It falls under the broader category of prudential financial regulation, aiming to enhance overall Finanzstabilität. This buffer requires banks to build up a capital reserve during normal times, which can then be drawn down when losses are incurred, without triggering immediate regulatory intervention that would further constrain lending or operations. The Kapitalerhaltungspuffer is typically composed of high-quality Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital.
⁵⁷, ⁵⁸

History and Origin

The concept of the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer emerged as a direct response to the Global Finanzkrise of 2007–2009. Prior to the crisis, banks often operated with minimal capital above regulatory requirements, leading to severe issues when losses materialized. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), an international body of banking supervisory authorities, developed the Basel III framework to address these vulnerabilities and strengthen the resilience of the global banking system.

A⁵⁵, ⁵⁶ consultative document published by the BCBS in December 2009 considered various measures to address procyclicality, the tendency for financial systems to amplify economic booms and busts. One key objective was to "conserve capital to build buffers that can be used in stress." Th⁵⁴is objective gave rise to the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer. The proposal was formally incorporated into the Basel III framework released in December 2010. It⁵³s full implementation was phased in, concluding by 2019.

#⁵²# Key Takeaways

• The Kapitalerhaltungspuffer is a mandatory capital buffer designed to ensure banks can absorb losses.
• It is set at 2.5% of a bank's risikogewichtete Aktiva and must be met with Common Equity Tier 1 capital.
• ⁵⁰, ⁵¹ The buffer is intended to be used in times of stress, allowing banks to maintain operations without immediate constraints.
• ⁴⁸, ⁴⁹ Falling below the required level triggers automatic restrictions on Ausschüttungen like Dividenden or bonus payments, incentivizing replenishment.
• ⁴⁶, ⁴⁷ It aims to reduce the Prozyklizität of the financial system.

⁴⁵Formula and Calculation

The Kapitalerhaltungspuffer (CCoB) is calculated as a percentage of a bank's total risk-weighted assets (RWAs). The standard requirement under Basel III is 2.5%.

The⁴³, ⁴⁴ formula can be expressed as:

This amount is held in addition to the minimum Kernkapital requirements. For instance, if a bank has risk-weighted assets of €100 billion, its Kapitalerhaltungspuffer would be €2.5 billion. This capital must consist of Common Equity Tier 1.

Interp⁴²reting the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer

The Kapitalerhaltungspuffer serves as a critical indicator of a bank's resilience and its capacity to withstand adverse economic conditions. A bank that fully meets its Kapitalerhaltungspuffer requirement demonstrates strong financial health and a robust ability to absorb unexpected losses. The primary intent is for banks to "use" this buffer during periods of stress. When a bank's CET1 capital ratio falls into the buffer range (i.e., below the total capital requirement including the buffer), it triggers a mechanism that restricts discretionary Ausschüttungen. The severit⁴⁰, ⁴¹y of these restrictions increases as the bank's capital ratio further depletes into the buffer, providing a strong incentive to rebuild capital. This mechan³⁹ism helps ensure that capital is conserved when it is most needed, supporting the bank's continued operations and its ability to provide essential services like Kreditvergabe.

Hypothe³⁸tical Example

Consider "Alpha Bank," which has €200 billion in risikogewichtete Aktiva. According to regulations, Alpha Bank must maintain a Kapitalerhaltungspuffer equal to 2.5% of its RWAs.

1. Calculate the required Kapitalerhaltungspuffer: $$\text{Required CCoB} = 0.025 \times €200 \text{ billion} = €5 \text{ billion}$$
2. Scenario 1: Normal Operations: Alpha Bank maintains €18 billion in Common Equity Tier 1 capital. This comfortably covers its minimum regulatory capital requirements (e.g., 4.5% CET1) and the €5 billion Kapitalerhaltungspuffer. In this scenario, Alpha Bank can freely make Dividenden payments and other discretionary distributions.
3. Scenario 2: Economic Downturn: Due to unexpected losses, Alpha Bank's Common Equity Tier 1 capital falls to €10 billion. While still above the minimum CET1 requirement, it has dipped into the buffer range (e.g., if the total CET1 requirement including the buffer is 7%, then 7% of €200 billion is €14 billion). Because its capital ratio is now below the combined requirement, Alpha Bank faces restrictions on its discretionary Ausschüttungen. The deeper into the buffer the capital falls, the tighter these restrictions become. This incentivizes Alpha Bank to conserve capital and rebuild its buffer, rather than paying it out.

Practical Applications

The Kapitalerhaltungspuffer is a cornerstone of modern bankenregulierung, serving several critical functions:

• Enhanced Resilience: It provides an additional layer of capital above the minimum requirements, making banks more resilient to unexpected financial shocks and economic downturns. This strengthens the banking system's ability to absorb losses without requiring taxpayer bailouts.
• Mitigating Procyclical³⁷ity: By requiring banks to build up capital during good economic times, the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer helps to counteract the natural tendency of the financial system to expand credit excessively during booms and contract sharply during busts. This contributes to overall Finanzstabilität.
• **Supervisory Framework:³⁶ It is an integral part of supervisory frameworks like the Capital Requirements Directive IV (CRD IV) and the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) in the European Union, which transpose the Basel III standards into law. These regulations ensure a ha³⁴, ³⁵rmonized approach to capital requirements across jurisdictions. The European Central Bank (ECB) views capital buffers as key to enabling banks to absorb losses while maintaining the provision of essential services to the economy.
• Incentivizing Prudence:³³ The automatic restrictions on Ausschüttungen incentivize banks to maintain robust capital levels and engage in sound Risikomanagement practices.

Limitations and Criticisms³²

Despite its intended benefits, the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer, as part of the broader Basel III framework, has faced certain criticisms and identified limitations:

• Potential Impact on Lending: Some critics argue that stricter capital requirements, including the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer, could lead to reduced Kreditvergabe by banks, especially during economic upswings, potentially affecting economic growth. However, other analyses sugges³⁰, ³¹t that while some impacts on lending growth were observed, overall capital increases were driven by capital accumulation rather than exposure reductions.
• Complexity: The entire²⁸, ²⁹ Basel III framework, including its various capital buffers, has been criticized for its increased complexity, which can pose challenges for both regulators and banks in understanding and implementing the rules.
• Usability in Crisis: W²⁶, ²⁷hile buffers are intended to be used in a crisis, there has been anecdotal evidence suggesting that banks might be unwilling to draw them down as needed due to concerns about market perception or stigma, potentially undermining their effectiveness. Regulators have sought to addr²⁴, ²⁵ess this through clear communication.
• Operational Adjustments:²³ Banks have had to make significant operational adjustments to comply with the new capital buffer requirements, including changes to dividend policies and Risikomanagement strategies.

Kapitalerhaltungspuffer vs²². Antizyklischer Kapitalpuffer

While both the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer (Capital Conservation Buffer, CCoB) and the Antizyklischer Kapitalpuffer (Countercyclical Capital Buffer, CCyB) are core components of Basel III and aim to enhance bank resilience, they serve distinct purposes and operate differently within the Bankenaufsicht framework.

In essence, the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer acts as a standing reserve, while the Antizyklischer Kapitalpuffer is a dynamic tool designed to manage systemic risks stemming from credit cycles. Both buffers must be met with Common Equity Tier 1 capital.

FAQs

What is the main ⁷, ⁸purpose of the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer?

The main purpose of the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer is to ensure that banks build and maintain a sufficient cushion of high-quality Eigenkapital that can be used to absorb losses during periods of financial stress. This prevents banks from depleting their capital to dangerous levels and helps maintain Finanzstabilität.

How much capital is require⁶d for the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer?

Under international banking standards, the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer typically requires banks to hold an additional 2.5% of their risikogewichtete Aktiva as Common Equity Tier 1 capital.

What happens if a bank fail⁵s to meet its Kapitalerhaltungspuffer?

If a bank's capital ratio falls below the level required for the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer, it faces automatic restrictions on its discretionary Ausschüttungen. This includes limitations on paying out Dividenden, repurchasing shares, or paying discretionary bonuses. The stricter the shortfall, the more severe the restrictions, incentivizing the bank to rebuild its capital.

Is the Kapitalerhaltungspuff³, ⁴er the same as the Leverage Ratio?

No, the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer is distinct from the Leverage Ratio. While both are part of Basel III and aim to enhance financial stability, the Kapitalerhaltungspuffer is a risk-weighted capital requirement designed to absorb losses, whereas the Leverage Ratio is a non-risk-weighted measure that acts as a backstop to limit excessive leverage.

When was the Kapitalerhaltun²gspuffer fully implemented?

The Kapitalerhaltungspuffer, as part of the Basel III reforms, was phased in over several years and became fully implemented by 2019.¹